Carotid Stenosis
نویسنده
چکیده
..................................................................................................................... 1 Sammanfattning på svenska (Swedish Summary) ................................................. 3 Abbreviations and Glossary ..................................................................................... 5 Original Papers ......................................................................................................... 8 Foreword .................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 10 General risk factors and treatment for Stroke ...................................................... 10 The pathophysiology of carotid stenosis ............................................................. 12 Atherosclerosis .................................................................................................... 12 The clinical appearances of carotid stenosis ........................................................ 12 Hemodynamic or embolic? .................................................................................. 13 Crossover embolization ....................................................................................... 15 Carotid occlusions ............................................................................................... 17 Carotid near-occlusions ...................................................................................... 18 Management of carotid stenosis .......................................................................... 20 History ................................................................................................................. 20 Carotid surgery and angioplasty .......................................................................... 20 Medical management of patients with carotid stenosis ....................................... 21 Carotid imaging .................................................................................................... 23 Diagnostic tests in general ................................................................................... 23 Measurements of carotid stenosis ........................................................................ 24 Imaging modalities .............................................................................................. 25 Translating flow velocities to percent diameter reduction ................................... 27 Choosing translation method – systematic review and consensus conference .... 27 Are non-invasive modalities accurate enough for clinical decisions? ................. 28 What modality should be used for screening? ..................................................... 29 Is confirmation with conventional angiography required? .................................. 29 Using multiple non-invasive modalities .............................................................. 30 Should confirmation with another non-invasive modality be routine? ............... 32 Patient Selection to Carotid Intervention ........................................................... 33 Subgroup interpretations in general ..................................................................... 33 Subgroup differences for symptomatic carotid stenosis ...................................... 34 Assessing the medical risk: the carotid risk model .............................................. 35 Assessment of treatment effect: the PARRCEA table ......................................... 36 Comparison of the carotid risk model and the PARRCEA table ......................... 41 Asymptomatic carotid stenosis: the past, present and future ............................... 42 Background of the studies in this thesis ................................................................ 44 HUS study ........................................................................................................... 44 ANSYSCAP study .............................................................................................. 44 PtU study ............................................................................................................. 45 Aims .......................................................................................................................... 48 Methods .................................................................................................................... 49 The standardized preoperative evaluation before CEA at Umeå Stroke Centre .. 49 HUS Study ............................................................................................................ 50 Population ascertainment..................................................................................... 50 Inclusion criteria .................................................................................................. 50 Registered parameters and analyses .................................................................... 50 ANSYSCAP Study ............................................................................................... 51 Population ascertainment..................................................................................... 51 Inclusion criteria .................................................................................................. 51 Registered parameters and analyses .................................................................... 51 PtU Study .............................................................................................................. 54 Population ascertainment..................................................................................... 54 Inclusion criteria .................................................................................................. 54 Registered parameters and analyses .................................................................... 54 Reference persons ................................................................................................ 55 Imaging methods ................................................................................................. 56 General Methods .................................................................................................. 56 Definitions and outcomes .................................................................................... 56 Statistical methods ............................................................................................... 56 Ethics ................................................................................................................... 57 Results ...................................................................................................................... 58 HUS and ANSYSCAP: Population description ................................................. 58 HUS Study ........................................................................................................... 58 ANSYSCAP study .............................................................................................. 58 HUS and ANSYSCAP: Delay to CEA ................................................................ 60 Presenting event – CEA in the HUS Study ......................................................... 60 Presenting event – CEA in the ANSYSCAP Study ............................................. 61 Different parts of the management chain in both studies .................................... 61 HUS and ANSYSCAP: Additional symptoms ................................................... 65 HUS Study ........................................................................................................... 65 ANSYSCAP Study .............................................................................................. 65 ANSYSCAP study: Risk of ipsilateral ischemic stroke recurrence ..................... 65 Perioperative risk ................................................................................................. 68 PtU study ............................................................................................................... 69 Discussion................................................................................................................. 72 HUS study ............................................................................................................. 72 Main findings ...................................................................................................... 72 The delay to CEA – including the data from the ANSYSCAP study .................. 72 Limitations .......................................................................................................... 72 Summary ............................................................................................................. 73 ANSYSCAP study ................................................................................................ 74 Main findings ...................................................................................................... 74 Design.................................................................................................................. 74 Comparison to previous similar studies ............................................................... 74 Subgroup findings ............................................................................................... 75 Power calculation ................................................................................................ 76 Limitations .......................................................................................................... 78 Interpretation ....................................................................................................... 79 Speculations on the possible impact .................................................................... 80 Summary ............................................................................................................. 82 PtU study ............................................................................................................... 83 Main findings ...................................................................................................... 83 Design.................................................................................................................. 83 Comparison to previous similar studies ............................................................... 83 Subgroup findings ............................................................................................... 84 Limitations .......................................................................................................... 84 Interpretation ....................................................................................................... 84 Experiences from clinical implementation .......................................................... 85 Speculations on the possible impact .................................................................... 85 Summary ............................................................................................................. 86 General Discussion ............................................................................................... 87 Possible alternative data sources ......................................................................... 87 Statistics .............................................................................................................. 87 Ethics ................................................................................................................... 88 For the clinician that manages patients with stroke ............................................. 88 Personal views ..................................................................................................... 89 Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 90 Acknowledgments ................................................................................................... 91 References ................................................................................................................ 93 Appendix: Papers I-IV
منابع مشابه
Carotid angioplasty and stenting in a patient with high grade stenosis of Internal Carotid Artery associated with both vertebral arteries and contralateral carotid occlusion
Severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis is a common cause of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) in middle-aged patients. Contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO) in patients with severe ICA stenosis is associated with high risk of CVA. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is associated with more complications in patients with CCO than those without CCO. In this study, we present the case of a 61-year-ol...
متن کاملCandida patients in a Jorjani center in Shahid Mohammadi Hospital of carotid Doppler sonnograghy findings in coronary artery Bypas grafting Bandar Abbas
Introduction: Nowadays caotid Dopplers sonography is gold standard for carotid artery screening in coronary aetery bypass grafting (CABG) candidates. This study was carried out in an angioplasty center in southern seaport in Iran to assesss theprevalence of artery stenosis and correlation of the atherosclerosis risk factor with the rate of artery stensis, and nence to define the high risk group...
متن کاملبررسی تنگی عروق کاروتید داخلی در مبتلایان به حملات ایسکمی گذرا در بیمارستان امام خمینی در سال های 1375 تا 1377
This is a prospective descriptive research which was carried out in Imam Khomeini Hospital related to Tehran University during two years (1375-1377) in order to study the incidence of internal carotid stenosis in patients who suffered from TIA ot minor stroke. It was evaluated by duplex sonography. Risk factors of carotid stenosis were studied. 1052 patients who had cerebrovascular accident adm...
متن کاملANGIOPLASTY AND STENTING OF CAROTID ARTERY STENOSIS WITH EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICES
Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has recently been recommended as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) by some clinicians. Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the success rate and in-hospital and 30-day adverse events in our first experiences in Iran for CAS with protection devices, to document our results and guide further use of CAS. Methods: From December 2...
متن کاملبررسی دقت و همبستگی سونوگرافی داپلر رنگی با آنژیوگرافی در تعیین شدت تنگی عروق کاروتید گردنی در بیماران ایسکمی مغزی
This is retrospective double-blind research, which was carried out in Imam Khomeini hospital in order to study the accuracy of color Doppler ultrasonography for detecting the site and grade of stenosis in cervical carotid artery. 40 patients with mean age of 62 years studied with color Doppler before DSA angiography. The most common sites of stenosis were left internal carotid (39.5%) and right...
متن کاملمقایسه توپوگرافی تنگی قلمروکاروتید در بیماران سکته مغزی با دو نژاد آمریکای شمالی و ایرانی
Introduction: Atherosclerotic stenosis of carotid territory is the most common cause of ischemic stroke. A higher frequency of intracranial arterial stenosis has been reported in Africa and the Far East. Methods: 304 geriatric ischemic stroke patients admitted in Mackenzie hospital, Canada and the same number of geriatric ischemic stroke patients with similar sex ratio admitted in Valie-Asr ho...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011